Skip to content
studie
20 June 2014

Participating and making decisions online – Participation study 2014 of the HIIG

The rise of the Internet has been accompanied by the promise of an overall democratization like no other medium before (Dorer, 2008). Ever since, the discussion about increasing participation in society is closely linked to the question of the democratic potential of the web. Thus, the issue with online participation is mostly linked to the use of the political Internet. But the academic discourse of online participation reaches far beyond the participation research in political science: the potential of online participation has also been recognized in the economic context. Online-based participation formats are increasingly implemented into practice (Füller et al., 2011). Design platforms and crowdfunding are just a few examples of online participation in the economic context.

The participation study of the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society which was published this week, embraces both perspectives. The representative study, in cooperation with TNS infratest, provides information about the participation behaviour of German Internet users, as well as about the political and economic context. An interdisciplinary team collected data from 13 different participation offerings. The spectrum goes from online petitions to participatory budgets, and from the developments of products to the design of campaigns.

Online participation in political and economic context

Despite comparable concepts and platforms of the participation offerings in the political and economic sector, there are central differences regarding the intention as well as success criteria of online participation projects: in the political field the aim is to legitimate political decision-making processes and to reach and involve broad sections of society. Whereas in the economic sector it is of particular relevance for the company to gain insight into the needs and interests of the participating customers.

Broad participation…

One of the most important findings of the study is the broad use of the participation formats: nearly 50 percent of those questioned, participated in a political platform or in the developments of products. Especially 18- 36 years olds are very active, men more than women. The findings of the study contribute to empirical results within the participation research which state that the probability of online participation increases with formal education. Moreover, empirical findings show that offline and online similar groups of people are participating. Age, level of education and political interest are crucial factors for participation – online as well as offline.

… in average one and a half hours

In regard to time, respondents show remarkable commitment: in average, participants spend one and a half hour participating. The collected data refers to the participation form which each respondent remembered best. The data shows that signing e-petitions has the highest reach among the respondents but the shortest participation duration. In contrast, competitions for developing products online have the lowest number of participants but the longest participation duration. The possibility to win a price might be decisive for this commitment.

Very popular: signing online petitions

Online petitions have turned into a popular form of political participation. Respondents report a big interest in setting up online petitions themselves but due to the required effort, actual participation numbers stay very low.

Taken as a whole, participation offerings in the economic context are less well known than the political ones. However, crowdfunding and online product configuration grasp a high significance reach a high range in the online population.

Motivations and incentives behind participating online

A cluster analysis of responses concerning the motivation for participating online shows different groups of participants with the same incentive structures: one of the groups consists of highly motivated people who report a high enjoyment while participating and have a great interest in the outcome of their task. Another group is especially interested in achieving learning effects and winning prices while the other user group has limited motivation and is mainly participating because of the possibility to win a prize – but not because of the participation task itself.

Increasing competition in the field of online participation

Quantity and quality of online participation offerings are rising – not least because of the increasing expectations of citizens in the transparency of political processes and demands for increased participation in political decision-making processes. The growing number of participation formats is accompanied by an increasing competition, especially in the political field. Active participants will be spread out and the common criterion for success – a broad participation – will be even more difficult to achieve.

Read more

This post represents the view of the author and does not necessarily represent the view of the institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and associated research projects, please contact info@hiig.de.

Julia Ebert

Former Student Assistant: Internet-enabled Innovation

Sign up for HIIG's Monthly Digest

HIIG-Newsletter-Header

You will receive our latest blog articles once a month in a newsletter.

Explore current HIIG Activities

Research issues in focus

HIIG is currently working on exciting topics. Learn more about our interdisciplinary pioneering work in public discourse.

Further articles

Three groups of icons representing people have shapes travelling between them and a page in the middle of the image. The page is a simple rectangle with straight lines representing data used for people analytics. The shapes traveling towards the page are irregular and in squiggly bands.

Empowering workers with data

As workplaces become data-driven, can workers use people analytics to advocate for their rights? This article explores how data empowers workers and unions.

A stylised illustration featuring a large "X" in a minimalist font, with a dry branch and faded leaves on one side, and a vibrant blue bird in flight on the other. The image symbolises transition, with the bird representing the former Twitter logo and the "X" symbolising the platform's rebranding and policy changes under Elon Musk.

Two years after the takeover: Four key policy changes of X under Musk

This article outlines four key policy changes of X since Musk’s 2022 takeover, highlighting how the platform's approach to content moderation has evolved.

The picture shows a tractor cultivating a field from above. One side of the field is covered in green, the other is dry and earthy. This is intended to show that although sustainable AI can be useful in the fight against climate change, it also comes at a high ecological cost.

Between vision and reality: Discourses about Sustainable AI in Germany

This article explores Sustainable AI and Germany's shift from optimism to concern about its environmental impact. Can AI really combat climate change?