Unsere vernetzte Welt verstehen
Kritische Stimmen und Visionen für Internet Governance
Das Internet hat unsere Welt verändert. Aber hat es auch hierarchische Machtstrukturen irritiert und allen eine Stimme verliehen? Werden Unterschiede in der Offline-Welt wie der Zugang zum individuellen und gesellschaftlichen Fortschritt und deren Erzählungen durch das Internet herausgefordert – oder repliziert und technologisch weitergeführt? Die Internet Governance, so breit und multistakeholderorientiert sie auch geworden ist, ist immer noch nicht inklusiv, offen und flexibel genug, um alle Stimmen zu erfassen.
Die von Katharina Mosene und Matthias C. Kettemann herausgegebene Sammlung bietet Platz für einige von ihnen. Mit Blick auf das 14. Internet Governance Forum im November 2019 in Berlin haben die ForscherInnen einen Katalog von 30 Visionen für ein emanzipatorisches Internet ohne Diskriminierung entwickelt.
Prefaces
Towards an internet that empowers those who foster democracy through human rights based research
by Center for Internet and Human Rights
Between borrowed identities and online self-fashioning: A case for content diversity
by Baldeep Grewal, IGF Dynamic Coalition on gender and internet governance
Feminism affects everyone
by Christina Dinar & Katharina Mosene & Francesca Schmidt, Netzforma*
Digitization affects everyone, but not everyone benefits equally.
From a feminist perspective, we therefore call for equal access to the Internet and digital content, protection against online violence and the creation of non-discriminatory spaces. We demand the right to personal data, to privacy, data security and data protection. We call for and promote a critical digital public sphere and a sustainable copyright-policy.
Digital Violence
We need to fight Digital Violence. Digital violence is a form of discrimination that aims at excluding people through sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic or other inhuman hate speech. It is the violent continuation of discrimination. Digital violence undermines freedom of expression and poses a threat to democracy. It includes identity theft, rumours and false allegations, intimidation/pressing, insult, threat, stalking, defamation/ obeyance, doxing, swatting and threats of rape. Often feminist positions are tackled by digital violence, this is what we call “silencing”. There are well-organized communities built upon anti-feminism in the area of gaming, in the context of Reddit’s nerd supremacy, in right-wing extremist to right-wing populist milieus, and even in Incel forums.
Surveillance
We need to fight unauthorized mass surveillance. We’re being watched every step of the way. Whether we travel by public transport, withdraw money, shop online or ask search engines. We are observed by various actors: the state, private security service providers, multinational corporations and not least ourselves. In public spaces, even our mere presence is enough to consent to video camera surveillance. Surveillance in public spaces comes with the promise of greater security and often feminist demands for the prevention of violence against women in public spaces are used as legitimation. But greater security always means greater control. Those groups who are most affected by this are marginalized groups. For LGBTQI*, surveillance carries a much higher risk.
Big Data
We need to develop feminist AI. Autonomous driving, household robotics and language assistants* – the buzzword AI nearly pops up everywhere. One thing is clear: technology in general and algorithmic processes in particular are not conceivable without reference to power and domination. It is precisely for this reason that these systems must be viewed critically, evaluated and redeveloped against the background of feminist perspectives and values. The basic mathematical formula of the algorithms must therefore be as follows: If AI, then feminist. Algorithms or artificial intelligence can enable or help if, for example, they detect tumours on X-ray images with much greater accuracy and much faster than would be possible for humans. But artificial intelligence can also restrict or discriminate against people if, for example, AI decides whether a person is creditworthy or gets health insurance. Neither the data basis nor the technologies are neutral. Discriminatory stereotypes, which have already manifested themselves in the world and thus in the data, are (unconsciously) transferred into the code. Lacking transparency then leads to a consolidation and intensification of discrimination.
The statements
Offline or online. Mine!
by Nana Kesewaa Dankwa, University of Kassel
Dealing with the cause, rather than trying to clear up afterwards: changing men’s attitudes to women and technology
by Tim Unwin, Chairholder, UNESCO Chair in ICT4D
Online Freedom of Expression in the Era of #MeToo
by Shmyla Khan, Digital Rights Foundation
Digitalisation is not just bounded to technology, it affects our society at large
Tatiana Bazzichelli, Disruption Network Lab
Youth voices in Internet Governance – visibility beyond tokenism?
by Elisabeth Schauermann, German Informatics Society
The Portals to the World are Locked for Millions
by Raul Aguayo-Krauthausen, Sozialhelden
Effective legal protection against hate speech online as anti-discrimination measure
by Kathrin Ganz & Kathy Meßmer & Kelda Niemeyer, Otherwise Network e.V.
Tyranny by Database in Kenya
by Kedolwa Waziri, Nubian community
Non-discrimination by design?!
by Claude Draude, University of Kassel
How EU norms impact marginalized communities around the world
by Chloé Berthélémy, European Digital Rights Movement
Something has got to give
by Dia Kayyali, WITNESS
Governing the Flows of Information in Control Societies
by Josef Barla, Goethe University Frankfurt & Christoph Hubatschke, University of Vienna
Towards a Feminist Data Future
by Nicole Shephard
Against Prediction – The Power of Imagination in the Age of Codes and Numbers
by Katrin Fritsch & Diana Kozachek & Helene von Schwichow, MOTIF Institute for Digital Culture
Making Internet Access for All a Reality
by Matthias C. Kettemann, Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI) and Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG)
Designing a better internet
by Caroline Sinders
Challenges to a safer and more inclusive Internet to children and teens: should we rely so much on consent and informed decisions?
by Kelli Angelini & Marina Feferbaum & Guilherme Klafke & Stephane Hilda Barbosa Lima & Tatiane Guimarães, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
“Solidarity is our weapon”
by Ricarda Drüeke, University of Salzburg
Enabling Youth Participation in Internet Governance
by Uffa Modey, Coordinator of the Nigeria Youth IGF
Restriction of Rights or Right of Restriction? An Inclusive Internet Depends on Proactive, Protective Legislation
by Nakeema Stefflbauer, FrauenLoop.org
Making a Feminist Internet
by Association for Progressive Communications (APC)
- Access and technology usage. A feminist internet starts with enabling more women and people of diverse genders and sexualities to enjoy universal, acceptable, affordable, open, meaningful and equal access to the internet, and have the right to create, design, adapt and critically and sustainably use ICTs.
- Internet as a political space. The internet is a transformative political space. A feminist internet facilitates new forms of citizenship that enable individuals to claim, construct and express selves, genders, and sexualities.
- Governance and the economy. A feminist internet also implies challenging the patriarchal spaces and processes that control its governance. The capitalist logic that drives technology towards further privatisation, profit, and corporate control should also be interrogated. We should work towards alternative forms of economic power grounded in principles of cooperation, solidarity, commons, environmental sustainability, and openness.
- Freedom of expression, agency, and consent. We defend the right to sexual expression as a freedom of expression issue of no less importance than political or religious expression. We support reclaiming and creating alternative erotic content that resists the mainstream patriarchal gaze and locates women and queer persons’ desires at the center.
- Privacy, data, anonymity, and memory. We support the right to privacy and to full control over our personal data, information and personal history and memory on the internet. We also defend the right to be anonymous and reject all claims to restrict anonymity online.
- Children and youth. The voices and experiences of young people must be included in the decisions about safety and security online, and the promotion of their safety, privacy, and access to information.
- Online gender-based violence. Policymakers and the private sector need to address online gender-based violence (GBV) against women and people of diverse genders and sexualities. Individual internet users also have a role to play, by calling out and not spreading online gender-based violence. The attacks, threats, intimidation and policing experienced are real, harmful and alarming, and are part of the broader issue of GBV. Realizing a feminist internet implies ending this.
If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen
by Katharina Mosene, Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI), Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society and netzforma* e.V.
Non-Marginalized Groups laid the Groundwork for Toxic Online Dynamics Today …
by Jonathan Zittrain, Harvard University
… therefore marginalized Groups have to be included in making Speech Policies
by Jillian York, Electronic Frontier Foundation
Because I am involved!
by Nnenna Nwakanma, World Wide Web Foundation
Internet governance needs tough love
by Marietje Schaake, Stanford University
Quellen und Literatur
Um Quellen- und Literaturangaben für die einzelnen Statements einzusehen, schlagen Sie bitte in der Publikation nach. Der untenstehende Button führt Sie hin.
Dieser Beitrag spiegelt die Meinung der Autorinnen und Autoren und weder notwendigerweise noch ausschließlich die Meinung des Institutes wider. Für mehr Informationen zu den Inhalten dieser Beiträge und den assoziierten Forschungsprojekten kontaktieren Sie bitte info@hiig.de
Jetzt anmelden und die neuesten Blogartikel einmal im Monat per Newsletter erhalten.
Plattform Governance
Beschäftigte durch Daten stärken
Arbeitsplätze werden zunehmend datafiziert. Doch wie können Beschäftigte und Gewerkschaften diese Daten nutzen, um ihre Rechte zu vertreten?
Zwei Jahre nach der Übernahme: Vier zentrale Änderungen im Regelwerk von X unter Musk
Der Artikel beschreibt vier zentrale Änderungen im Regelwerk der Plattform X seit Musks Übernahme 2022 und deren Einfluss auf die Moderation von Inhalten.
Zwischen Vision und Realität: Diskurse über nachhaltige KI in Deutschland
Der Artikel untersucht die Rolle von KI im Klimawandel. In Deutschland wächst die Besorgnis über ihre ökologischen Auswirkungen. Kann KI wirklich helfen?